WebMD Medical News
Laura J. Martin, MD
Aug. 8, 2011 (Washington, D.C.) -- Being in love may enhance your athletic prowess, a survey of about 400 competitive athletes suggests.
"Based on our findings, being in a loving relationship is helpful to athletic performance, particularly if it's a long-term committed relationship," says study head Kelly Campbell, PhD, assistant professor of psychology at California State University in San Bernardino.
The research doesn't prove that love will help you perform better or win a competition. "But on some intuitive level, it makes sense," says Temple University sports psychologist Michael L. Sachs, PhD.
"If you’re in love, life is generally better and you feel more energized," he tells WebMD. Sachs was not involved with the work.
Still, it could be that athletes in a loving, committed relationship share some other factor that explains their improved performance, Sachs says.
"Maybe they don't have to put dinner on the table or take care of the kids, giving them more time to focus on their sport," he says.
Campbell tells WebMD that studies in which MRI scans showed that people in love have increased activity in the reward and motivation region of the brain gave her the idea for the research.
"These are the same systems that are activated in people intensely focused on a rewarding outcome, such as winning a competition," she says.
An ideal study would have been to compare brain images of athletes in love with those of athletes not in love, Campbell says. But as a preliminary step, the researchers simply asked athletes whether they thought being in love helps or hinders their performance.
The study involved 265 female and 133 male competitive athletes, aged 16 to 38, willing to participate in a 10- to 20-minute interview. About 85% were colleges athletes, 8% were professional athletes, and 7% were Olympic athletes.
Among the results, presented here at the American Psychological Association meeting:
These findings were presented at a medical conference. They should be considered preliminary as they have not yet undergone the "peer review" process, in which outside experts scrutinize the data prior to publication in a medical journal.
SOURCES:American Psychological Association's 119th Annual Convention, Washington, D.C., Aug. 4-7, 2011.Kelly Campbell, PhD, assistant professor of psychology, California State University, San Bernardino.Michael L. Sachs, PhD, professor, department of kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia.
Here are the most recent story comments.View All
© 2015 Ramar Communications |
Site Map |
Privacy Statement |
Copyright & Trademark Notice |
EEO Report |
FCC Public Files |
Closed Captioning |