Why wait on a 'Noah' sequel?

Reported by: James Eppler
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Updated: 3/31/2014 11:40 am

On Twitter: @JamesEppler

There are two big complaints about Darren Aronofsky's "Noah" from both religious groups hating on the movie and critics who liked it: The liberties taken with scripture, and the so-called "Rock People" (although I prefer to call them Rock Angels because they're angels, not men).

While "Noah" can't be called a box office smash, it was at least successful on opening weekend. That means it's time to green-light a sequel, right? This is Hollywood, people! It's time to go bigger, and that doesn't mean it has to be better. 

So I say let's lean into those two biggest criticisms of the original and create a sequel that will follow a model guaranteed to sell tickets: I call it "The Hobbit" model. Peter Jackson made three huge movies out of a small book, and didn't worry with staying true to the source material. He just loaded it up with special effects, monsters, spiders and sword fights and hardly anyone complained. I didn't see any religious groups boycotting the movie claiming an attack on Tolkien's work, who was a Christian.

So here's my pitch for any studio heads reading this blog or anyone who might have connections in Hollywood. This is gold:

"Noah 2: Return of the Rock Angels"

And you thought God was mad before

After realizing He left a drunk and his family in charge of repopulating and taking care of Creation, God sends the newly-forgiven Nephilim back to Earth to finish the job. Noah and his family take up arms against the Rock Angels to defend Creation. But they can't do it alone.

Fortunately, Methuselah returns from his watery grave to provide Noah with some magic. We can call him Methuselah the White, but that might be a little obvious. 

Methuselah whips up some more magic tea to turn the beasts of the Earth into warriors to fight alongside Noah's family. (Good thing they were vegetarians in the first movie, otherwise this wouldn't work). We'd have lions armed with swords and shields, bears decked out with war paint ala "Braveheart," scores of deer charging with their antlers, you get the idea.

Instead of an Ark, the Noah family builds a fortress like the Alamo. This will be the Earth's last stand.

In the end, the Rock Angels are defeated and God decides not to wipe out Creation again after all.
"So the Lord changed his mind about the harm which He said He would do to His people." Exodus 32:14

Boom. Trump card. We're Bible-based now.

Obviously, we need to get Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connolly back for this sequel, but I'm not sure Darren Aronofsky is the right choice to make this kind of follow-up to his artistically beautiful movie. We need someone who is experienced in making crowd-pleasing garbage; someone who knows how to make money; someone who isn't afraid to ignore artistic choices in favor of noise, special effects, and mayhem. We also need someone who doesn't have a soul because if it turns out this movie is blasphemous, the director might risk eternal damnation at the hands of an angry God.
The choice is clear: Michael Bay.

Once I get the okay on this project, I'll begin working on the screenplay. I'll be sure to write it in Crayon so it's pretty and bright for the studio heads reading it.

(Disclaimer: In case it's not clear, this piece is not written with the intent to offend religious folks or people who liked "Noah." But if some Hollywood people are bothered, well... )

2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

JamesEppler - 4/1/2014 9:57 AM
0 Votes
Jacob - you might want to re-read your Bible on the vegetarian point. In Genesis 1:29 God says “I give you every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; they shall be yours for good.” It's only after the flood in Genesis Chapter 9 that God gives man animals, too, and even then man is held accountable for the blood he sheds. But hey, haters gonna hate, right?

JacobGreenwood - 3/31/2014 2:03 PM
0 Votes
Noah a vegetarian? Really? Seems kind of silly to me, God gave man dominion over plants and animals . Humans are omnivores and we need animal protein for brain development.. Also, Noah (a recorded toolmaker.) and family were farmers and built the ark to preserve and continue life. If anything, Noah should have killed sociopathic Ham, after the flood, not his unborn grandchild on an ark where nobody was pregnant. Aronofsky should be reassured Noah existed and his sons and their descendants be traced through Chronicles in the Bible and archaeology to people and places today. In 2002, Holocaust survivors asked an artist to “Find Noah”, and in three internet days, he found all the grandchildren and where they lived. Why are the 7 Noahide laws, for Jews and Gentiles alike, still the basis for law on earth? I don’t think Darren knows, but he WANTS to know. Please experience…. http://www.NoahIsReal.com , a four part interactive essay where Noah’s descendants are traced through architecture, art history and the 3 style of hats, each son of Noah’s families wore (each had their own head covering style), the meteor that struck earth in 3123 bce and “messed things up” until this day…and more
Lubbock Weather
Partly Cloudy

Wind: ENE 12 mph
Feels Like: 92°
High: 95°
Low: 67°
Live Music on Good Day
Get your band on Good Day Lubbock!
Do you have a band or know a group you'd like to see featured on Good Day Lubbock? We have live music every Friday morning. Click for the details.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.